Decembris 2015, Virginia federālā žūrija, kurā dominē ka Web piegādātājs Cox Communications bija atbildīga par autortiesību pārkāpumiem, no saviem abonentiem. ISP tika atklāti, ir atbildīga par tīšu iemaksu autortiesību pārkāpumu un piesprieda maksāt "mūzikas arheoloģijā", BMG Tiesības Administrācija $25 miljonu zaudējumiem. Cox ātri iesniedzis apelācijas sūdzību, norādot, ka rajona tiesas zālē... Lasīt Vairāk »
Can an Web supplier be held accountable for subscribers who share pirated information? Sure, a Virginia federal jury ruled two years ago. Internet supplier Windstream is among the many firms which can be anxious in regards to the fallout. Ar 1.1 million subscribers nationwide, it is seemingly one among the bigger Web suppliers in the… Lasīt Vairāk »
Anti-piracy outfit rightscorp is amongst the many firms making an attempt to show web piracy into promatch. The corporate has a considerably novel method however has issue balancing the books. primarily, rightscorp operates like different so-called copyright-trolling operations, in that it screens alleged offenders on bittorrent networks, tracks them to their isps, then makes an… Lasīt Vairāk »
Music rights group BMG says that Internet providers RCN and Windstream should not be allowed to obtain a declaratory judgment on their potential liability for pirating subscribers. According to BMG, the providers are improperly trying immunize themselves, hiding behind the DMCA’s safe harbor.
Internet provider Cox Communications maintains that it’s not responsible for copyright infringements carried out by its subscribers. The company has announced that it will appeal the $25 million damages verdict in its case against music publisher BMG.